Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > J P Turner Fined $250 000 for Failing to Supervise Commissions Charged on

J.P. Turner Fined $250,000 for Failing to Supervise Commissions Charged on.

Filed in: Brokage Firm FraudInvestment Fraud
Posted: December 13, 2009 @ 8:22 am - Nicholas Guiliano
   J.P. Turner Fined $250,000 for Failing to Supervise Commissions Charged on Stock Trades

Washington, D.C. - The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has imposed a $250,000 fine against J.P. Turner & Company, LLC of Atlanta, GA, for failing to have an adequate supervisory system designed to ensure that its registered representatives charged customers fair and reasonable commissions on stock trades.

As part of the settlement, FINRA ordered J.P. Turner to retain, at its own expense, an independent consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of the adequacy of the firm's policies, systems, procedures, and training relating to FINRA's Fair Pricing Rule.

In order to establish a fair commission or mark-up, brokers must take into consideration all of the relevant circumstances and not just whether the commission is below a certain percentage of the total price of the transaction," said Susan Merrill, FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement. In this case, J.P. Turner allowed its brokers to charge commissions of up to 4.5% on almost every stock trade without regard to the circumstances, such as the size of the transaction, the cost of executing the order, or whether the securities were readily available in the market."

FINRA requires firms to implement a system and reasonable procedures to ensure that customers are fairly charged for transactions, taking into consideration all relevant factors. FINRA's mark-up policy lists seven factors for firms to consider: the type of security involved; the availability of the security in the market; the price of the security; the size of the transaction; disclosure to the customer; the pattern of the firm's mark-ups; and, the nature of the firm's business.

FINRA found that between January 2002 and March 2005, J.P. Turner's supervisory system and written procedures failed to take these factors into account and failed to provide adequate guidance to its registered representatives to determine a fair commission or mark-up on equity securities transactions.

FINRA found that under J.P. Turner's system and procedures, representatives had discretion to establish the commission on such transactions, limited only by whether the price of the security was above or below $25 per share. On all equity securities transactions in which the price of the security was below $25, registered representatives were allowed to charge up to 4.5%, while they could only charge up to 3.5% if the price of the security was above $25. During the review period, 91% of the firm's equity securities transactions involved securities priced below $25 per share.

J.P. Turner's trading manager was responsible for reviewing and approving trades for fair and reasonable charges. Those reviews, however, were limited to reviewing the transactions to ensure that the commissions charged did not exceed the firm's 3.5% and 4.5% guidelines.

In concluding this settlement, J.P. Turner neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA's findings.

Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  FINRA Says Charles Schwab & Co. Violated Rules with Class-Action Waiver  -  Charles Schwab & Co. violated regulatory rules by requiring customers ...
  Are Public Arbitrators Are More Likely to Award Damages than Those with Financial Expertise?  -  Back in October 2008, the Financial Industr...
  Merrill Lynch Fined $1 Million For Dodging Arbitration Mandated by FINRA  -  Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith has been censured and fined $1 mil...
  Former Red Sox Catcher Scores $1.2 Million Arbitration Award from Merrill Lynch  -  Doug Mirabelli, a former catcher for the Boston Red Sox, was awarded more ...
  Is FINRA Mandatory Arbitration Policy a Violation of Your Legal Rights?  -  According to ...
  FINRA Awards Damages for Firm’s Failure to Reasonably Inform Customers Regarding Bond Recommendation  -  On Jan. 9, an arbitrator for the Financial ...
  Supreme Court: Arbitration Clause in Contract Not Invalidated by Consumers’ Right to Sue  -  The U.S. Supreme Court issued an ...
  The SEC and FINRA Advise Investors to Proceed With Caution Concerning Non-Traded REITs  -  Stock market volatility and low interest rates these days have caused more...
  Wells Fargo Fined $2 Million for Selling Unsuitable Securities to Elderly Customers  -  Wells Fargo Investments LLC has been fined $2 million for failure to super...
  Wachovia Successor to Pay $148 Million to Settle Charges of Fraud and Bid Rigging  -  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank N.A., has agr...

Investment Literature
Broadbandits: Inside the $750 Billion Telecom Heist

Broadbandits: Inside the $750 Billion Telecom Heist

How to Be the Family CFO

How to Be the Family CFO


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (78)
» Broker Fraud (57)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (72)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (94)
» Merrill Lynch (11)
» Morgan Stanley (18)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (21)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (75)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (27)
» stockbroker theft (4)
» Unfair Securities Practices (81)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (1)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (2)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer