Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > Morgan Stanley Broker Charles Winitch Defrauds Disabled Children

Morgan Stanley Broker Charles Winitch Defrauds Disabled Children

Filed in: Morgan StanleyBrokage Firm FraudInvestment FraudFINRA Securities Arbitration
Posted: December 14, 2010 @ 11:43 am - Nicholas Guiliano
    The New York Stock Exchange disciplined former Morgan Stanley stockbroker Charles Winitch of Scarsdale, New York, for unauthorized trading, churning or excessive activity, and breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the accounts of his customers.

Mr. Winitch’s fraudulent conduct, however, relates to the accounts of children, who each received large sums of money as a result of medical malpractice claims, which was to be used for their long term care and living expenses.

In at least eight accounts, for the benefit of eight different children, established by their parents or guardians, and in most cases the only funds that these families had, Winitch engaged in the short term trading of Municipal bonds and United States bonds and treasury strips ("STRIPS"), generating in excess of $563,000 in commissions and fees.

In four of the eight cases, the children were from single parent homes, with the single parent being unemployed. In one case, the family did not speak English, as their primary language, and in another case, one parent was employed as a bus driver, and the mother as a school aid. In all cases, none of the parents had any prior investment experience, and the sums that they received from the medical malpractice claims of their children represented substantially the families only asset.

For example, in one case, a guardian account was opened for the benefit of a child (to provide care and furnish income), age 12, based on an award pursuant to a medical malpractice lawsuit.

New account documents reflect that the child’s mother and guardian, was single and unemployed, that she had no investment experience, and her annual income was listed as $100,000; the child’s net worth was listed as $1,000,000 (almost all of which was derived from the malpractice award); but the accounts investment objectives were, in order of priority, income, aggressive income, capital appreciation and speculation.

The child’s account was worth approximately $1,007,387. However, during the relevant period, Winitch effected 24 short-term STRIPS transactions, with no position held longer than five months, and generated approximately $95,802 in commissions and fees.

Nonetheless, in each of these cases, the Morgan Stanley new account forms falsely indicated that these individuals had six figure incomes, a multi-million dollar net worth and were interested in trading and speculation, and otherwise had the highest, most aggressive tolerance for risk or investment objective.

It also appears that Morgan Stanley did absolutely nothing to supervise Mr. Winitch, and ultimately only fired him after a regulatory investigation was commenced by the New York Stock Exchange.

 

The regulators, or self-regulatory authority, now known as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, of which Morgan Stanley is a member, based upon this conduct, "censured" Winitch and suspended him for a period of five years, meaning that in five years, after falsifying new account documents, and basically stealing from the accounts of disabled children, Winitch is free to be a stockbroker and a fiduciary once again.

However, perhaps not. But certainly not as a result of the securities regulators.

On December 10, 2010, following the filing of a Criminal Information against him, Winitch pled guilty in White Plains federal court to participating in a scheme to defraud and is scheduled to be sentenced on March 18, 2011, where he faces a maximum term of 20 years in prison, fines of up to $250,000, or twice the gross gain/loss resulting from the offense, restitution, and forfeiture of his ill-gotten gains.

The moral of the story is that even under the most egregious circumstances, most major brokerage firms do not supervise the activities of their registered representatives. They believe that falsely overstating a person’s overall financial condition or tolerance for risk absolves them and insulates them from all liability, and that even when they get caught, the regulators will only give them a slap on the wrist. Interestingly enough, Morgan Stanley was not cited for failing to supervise Winitch.

If you have been a victim of securities fraud or wrongful conduct by your stockbroker or investment advisor, you need to take legal action by hiring a competent attorney to sue them to recover your damages.

Our practice is limited to the representation of injured investors in claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals for fraud, the sale of unsuitable investments, churning, breach of fiduciary duty, and the failure to supervise. We handle all cases on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no costs unless we make a recovery for you. For more information, or a free, no risk consultation contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY or visit us at www.securitiesarbitrations.com.

 

 

 


Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  Court Dismisses Charles Schwab Suit that Challenged FINRA on Class Action Waivers  -  A federal court in California dismissed a complaint filed by Charles Schwa...
  Former Newbridge Securities Broker Suspended and Fined for Unsuitable Switching of Annuities  -  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (...
  Wells Fargo Brokerage Firms Fined for Failure to Supervise ETF Sales  -  A group of limited liability companies affiliated with Wells Fargo have ag...
  Morgan Stanley Fined $1.75 Million for Weak Supervision of ETF Sales  -  Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC has consented to be fined $1.75 million by th...
  UBS Puerto Rico to Pay $26 Million for Fraud Related to Mutual Funds  -  UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico and two of its executives have ...
  Former Ameritas Broker Barred by FINRA and Ordered to Pay Restitution  -  Harold E. Wilson, a former broker with ...
  The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Orders Transfer and Consolidation Of National Royal Alliance Ponzi Scheme Cases to Philadelphia  -  In October 2010, Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire of the Guiliano Law Firm, P...
  FINRA Files Action Against Former Broker for Misappropriation  -  The Department of Enforcement of the Financ...
  Federal Court Rules Ignorance no Excuse for Brokerage Firm that Employed Thieving Broker  -  An arbitration claim by Lucy and John Mattinen against White Pacific Secur...
  Former LPL Financial Broker Failed to Inform Firm About Promissory Notes  -  When Jeffrey D. Ogle, formerly a broker with LPL Financial LLC, induced fi...

Investment Literature
The Real Case Against Goldman Sachs

The Real Case Against Goldman Sachs

Does Your Broker Owe You Money

Does Your Broker Owe You Money


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (83)
» Broker Fraud (65)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (79)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (105)
» Merrill Lynch (12)
» Morgan Stanley (19)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (22)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (77)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (28)
» stockbroker theft (7)
» Unfair Securities Practices (92)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (2)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (3)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer