Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > FINRA Says Charles Schwab & Co Violated Rules with Class Action Waiver

FINRA Says Charles Schwab & Co. Violated Rules with Class-Action Waiver

Filed in: Stockbroker ArbitrationUnfair Securities PracticesFINRA Securities Arbitration
Posted: February 3, 2012 @ 6:52 pm - Nicholas Guiliano
    Charles Schwab & Co. violated regulatory rules by requiring customers to sign a contract with a provision waiving their rights to bring class actions against the firm, according to a complaint filed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on Feb. 1

Schwab is one of the nation’s largest discount brokerage firms, with more than 340 offices nationwide that together employ about 7,000 brokers. It has been a member of FINRA since 1970.

The firm amended its account agreement in October 2011 to include a provision stating that customers have waived their rights to bring a class action suit against Schwab or to participate in class actions against Schwab. The amended agreement was sent to nearly 7 million people.

The amended account agreement also contained a provision requiring to customers to agree that the claims of different customers cannot be consolidated by arbitrators in arbitration proceedings.

Under the terms of the new agreement, it was effective upon notification, the complaint said.

Both provisions violate FINRA rules prohibiting member firms from placing any condition in an account agreement that limits parties’ ability to file claims they are permitted to file in court per the rules of the forums where the claims may be filed under the agreement, the complaint said.

For example, FINRA Rule 12204(d) provides that a firm may not enforce an arbitration agreement against a member of a putative or certified class action unless 1) class certification is denied by a court, 2) the class is decertified for some reason, 3) the member of the putative or certified class action is excluded, or 4) the member withdraws or chooses not to participate in the class.

Regarding the provision that prohibits consolidation claims in arbitration, the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure makes it clear that class actions are permitted.

Because Schwab's conduct is ongoing, FINRA is seeking an expedited hearing.

The firm continues to use the agreements containing these provisions. In fact, since October 2011, Schwab has opened more than 50,000 new customer accounts using the amended account agreement.

According to a report from the Associated Press, Schwab disputes that it has violated FINRA rules. The firm has filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the class-action waiver provisions are valid per a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision. The suit was filed in federal court in San Francisco, where Schwab is based.

Schwab said it added the class-action waiver provisions to all of its accounts agreements in September after the Supreme Court handed down its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act takes precedence over cases or rules requiring access to class actions.

“Schwab believes a federal court is in the best position to properly and efficiently resolve this novel dispute, and intends to defend against any disciplinary action brought by FINRA,” the firm said in a statement.

The disciplinary complaint was filed with FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers by its Department of Enforcement. The complaint is a first step in a formal proceeding by FINRA. The findings in the complaint have not been proven.

Under FINRA rules, the firm can file a response and request a hearing before a FINRA disciplinary panel.

The complaint is requesting that the panel of hearing officers make findings of fact and conclusion of law that Schwab has violated FINRA rules. It also requests that the panel issue an order that Schwab cease violating the rules.

In addition, the complaint is seeking monetary sanctions, and for Schwab to bear the costs of the proceedings.

***

If you have been the victim of securities fraud you should consult with an attorney. The practice of Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esq., and The Guiliano Law Firm, P.C., is limited to the representation of investors in claims for fraud in connection with the sale of securities, the sale or recommendation of excessively risky or unsuitable securities, breach of fiduciary duty, and the failure to supervise. We accept representation on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost unless we make a recovery for you, and there is never any charge for a consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.


 FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co.     AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  Court Dismisses Charles Schwab Suit that Challenged FINRA on Class Action Waivers  -  A federal court in California dismissed a complaint filed by Charles Schwa...
  Former Newbridge Securities Broker Suspended and Fined for Unsuitable Switching of Annuities  -  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (...
  Wells Fargo Brokerage Firms Fined for Failure to Supervise ETF Sales  -  A group of limited liability companies affiliated with Wells Fargo have ag...
  Morgan Stanley Fined $1.75 Million for Weak Supervision of ETF Sales  -  Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC has consented to be fined $1.75 million by th...
  UBS Puerto Rico to Pay $26 Million for Fraud Related to Mutual Funds  -  UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico and two of its executives have ...
  Former Ameritas Broker Barred by FINRA and Ordered to Pay Restitution  -  Harold E. Wilson, a former broker with ...
  The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Orders Transfer and Consolidation Of National Royal Alliance Ponzi Scheme Cases to Philadelphia  -  In October 2010, Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire of the Guiliano Law Firm, P...
  FINRA Files Action Against Former Broker for Misappropriation  -  The Department of Enforcement of the Financ...
  Federal Court Rules Ignorance no Excuse for Brokerage Firm that Employed Thieving Broker  -  An arbitration claim by Lucy and John Mattinen against White Pacific Secur...
  Former LPL Financial Broker Failed to Inform Firm About Promissory Notes  -  When Jeffrey D. Ogle, formerly a broker with LPL Financial LLC, induced fi...

Investment Literature
Financial Self-Defense for Investors

Financial Self-Defense for Investors

Catching the Wolf of Wall Street: More Incredible True Stories of Fortunes, Schemes, Parties, and Prison

Catching the Wolf of Wall Street: More Incredible True Stories of Fortunes, Schemes, Parties, and Prison


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (83)
» Broker Fraud (65)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (79)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (105)
» Merrill Lynch (12)
» Morgan Stanley (19)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (22)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (77)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (28)
» stockbroker theft (7)
» Unfair Securities Practices (92)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (2)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (3)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer