Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > Inverse and Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds Wreak Havoc On Investors

Inverse and Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds Wreak Havoc On Investors

Filed in: Stockbroker ArbitrationBrokage Firm FraudInvestment FraudFINRA Securities Arbitration
Posted: March 13, 2011 @ 10:02 am - Nicholas Guiliano
    Investors suffering losses in Inverse and Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds may have claims against their stockbrokers or financial advisors for failure to disclose risk or perform due diligence.

An Exchange-Traded Fund ("ETF") is an investment fund traded on stock exchanges, much like stocks. An ETF holds assets such as stocks or bonds and trades at approximately the same price as the net asset value of its underlying assets over the course of the trading day. Most ETFs track an index, such as the S&P 500. ETFs may be attractive as investments because of their low costs, tax efficiency, and stock-like features. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange- traded_fund.

However, "Ultra" funds are highly leveraged funds, and are different from most ETFs in that it seeks leveraged returns and only on a daily basis. Accordingly, these Ultra Funds are also riskier than similarly benchmarked exchange-traded funds that do not use leverage.

Leveraged ETFs are one of the most controversial trading instruments to be introduced in recent years. Leveraged ETFs are meant to double, or in some cases triple, the daily performance of a particular index.

Because leveraged ETFs are bundles of derivatives, investors cannot buy and hold them the way they do similarly benchmarked ETFs. Derivatives have a time value portion that decays as each day goes by. And because the leveraged ETF portfolio needs to be constantly rebalanced, expenses consume any potential returns. In fact, as set forth herein, the SEC finds that certain leveraged ETFs produced negative returns even when the index it tracks moved up and that leveraged ETFs are too complicated and too risky for most retail investors.

"Non-traditional ETFs may not be suitable for retail investors" and "inverse and leveraged ETFs typically are not suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading session, particularly in volatile markets." See, D. Franceski, & Z. Knepper, Practical Compliance & Risk Management For The Securities Industry, Non-Traditional Exchange Traded Funds at 8 citing Regulatory Notice 09-31)(February 2010)

Inverse or leveraged ETFs are include a high degree of risk, and are not appropriate for all investors.

In May 2009, FINRA's Enforcement Department’s Strategic Programs Group conducted an inquiry regarding the sale of inverse, leveraged, and inverse-leveraged Exchange Traded Funds, and subsequently in June 2009, FINRA issued Notice to Members 99-31, reminding firms of:

their sales practice obligations in connection with leveraged and inverse ETFs. In particular, recommendations to customers must be suitable and based on a full understanding of the terms and features of the product recommended; sales materials related to leveraged and inverse ETFs must be fair and accurate; and firms must have adequate supervisory procedures in place to ensure that these obligations are met.

FINRA Notice to Members 99-31 (June 2009)(emphasis added).

In this Notice to Members, FINRA also warned members that: "Firms must train registered persons about the terms, features and risks of all ETFs that they sell, as well as the factors that would make such products either suitable or unsuitable for certain investors." Id. at 4 (emphasis added).

On August 18, 2009, the SEC staff and FINRA issued an Investors Alert, with respect to Leveraged and Inverse ETFs: Specialized Products with Extra Risks for Buy-and-Hold

Investors, and warned that:

before purchasing an inverse or leveraged ETF, investors should also consider seeking the advice of an investment professional. Be sure to work with someone who understands your investment objectives and tolerance for risk. Your investment professional should understand these complex products, be able to explain whether or how they fit with your objectives, and be willing to monitor your investment.

FINRA Investor Alert, August 19, 2009.

Most major brokerage firms aware of the risks associated with the purchase of leveraged or inverse ETFs, and in August 2009, stopped permitting solicited purchases of these ETFs in traditional brokerage accounts also told investors and regulators that: "Unsolicited purchases will be permitted only subject to enhanced oversight and review."

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors in claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals for fraud, the sale of unsuitable investments, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and the failure to supervise. We offer our services on a contingent fee basis. If you have suffered losses as a result of an investment in the inverse or leveraged Exchange Traded Funds or ETFs, contact us for a free no obligation evaluation of your claim at (877) SEC-ATTY or visit us in the internet at www.securitiesarbitrations.com.

Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire, The Guiliano Law Firm, P.C., 230 South Broad Street, Suite 601
Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 413-8223 (Telephone) (215) 413-8225 (Telecopier) nick@nicholasguiliano.com
www.securitiesarbitrations.com


 FINRA Notice to Members 09-31
Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  Court Dismisses Charles Schwab Suit that Challenged FINRA on Class Action Waivers  -  A federal court in California dismissed a complaint filed by Charles Schwa...
  Former Newbridge Securities Broker Suspended and Fined for Unsuitable Switching of Annuities  -  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (...
  Wells Fargo Brokerage Firms Fined for Failure to Supervise ETF Sales  -  A group of limited liability companies affiliated with Wells Fargo have ag...
  Morgan Stanley Fined $1.75 Million for Weak Supervision of ETF Sales  -  Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC has consented to be fined $1.75 million by th...
  UBS Puerto Rico to Pay $26 Million for Fraud Related to Mutual Funds  -  UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico and two of its executives have ...
  Former Ameritas Broker Barred by FINRA and Ordered to Pay Restitution  -  Harold E. Wilson, a former broker with ...
  The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Orders Transfer and Consolidation Of National Royal Alliance Ponzi Scheme Cases to Philadelphia  -  In October 2010, Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire of the Guiliano Law Firm, P...
  FINRA Files Action Against Former Broker for Misappropriation  -  The Department of Enforcement of the Financ...
  Federal Court Rules Ignorance no Excuse for Brokerage Firm that Employed Thieving Broker  -  An arbitration claim by Lucy and John Mattinen against White Pacific Secur...
  Former LPL Financial Broker Failed to Inform Firm About Promissory Notes  -  When Jeffrey D. Ogle, formerly a broker with LPL Financial LLC, induced fi...

Investment Literature
Risky Business: Corruption, Fraud, Terrorism & Other Threats to Global Business

Risky Business: Corruption, Fraud, Terrorism & Other Threats to Global Business

Cookin' the Book$: Say Pasta la Vista to Corporate Accounting Tricks and Fraud

Cookin' the Book$: Say Pasta la Vista to Corporate Accounting Tricks and Fraud


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (83)
» Broker Fraud (65)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (79)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (105)
» Merrill Lynch (12)
» Morgan Stanley (19)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (22)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (77)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (28)
» stockbroker theft (7)
» Unfair Securities Practices (92)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (2)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (3)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer