Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > SunTrust Investment Services Fined $1 44 Million for Fraudulent Sales of Unit Investment trusts and Mutual Funds

SunTrust Investment Services Fined $1.44 Million for Fraudulent Sales of Unit Investment trusts and Mutual Funds.

Filed in: FINRA Securities ArbitrationInvestment FraudMutual Fund FraudBroker Fraud
Posted: July 23, 2010 @ 12:25 pm - Nicholas Guiliano
    SunTrust Investment Services Fined $1.44 Million for Fraudulent Sales of Unit Investment trusts and Mutual Funds.

Sanction Includes $540,000 to Defrauded Customers;

Broker David Bredenburg Barred

Donald Mattran , Former Branch Manager Suspended

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today thatSunTrust Investment Services, Inc. has agreed to pay$1.44 million to settle regulatory charges that it sold unsuitable unit investment trusts (UIT), closed-end fund (CEF) and mutual fund transactions to 17 customers who incurred losses.

Of that amount, $900,000 is a fine that includes nearly $224,000 in disgorgement of commissions earned on the unsuitable trades.

The remaining $540,000 represents restitution to 17 customers who incurred losses.

As part of this settlement, SunTrust must also review all UIT purchases and provide remediation to all eligible customers who did not receive the maximum sales charge discount.

SunTrust failed to meet that obligation, which caused its customers, including elderly customers, to incur significant losses.

FINRA found that SunTrust, through two brokers in the firm's Maryland Region, engaged in a pattern of unsuitable short-term UIT, CEF and mutual fund transactions in accounts of 17 customers, most of whom were elderly and/or disabled.

The brokers also engaged in unsuitable margin transactions in the accounts of 10 of the 17 customers. In addition, FINRA found that SunTrust failed to ensure that eligible customers received the maximum sales charge discount on UIT purchases and lacked adequate systems and procedures for monitoring and supervising these transactions.

FINRA previously sanctioned one of the individual brokers involved in this matter, David Bredenburg of Timonium, MD, permanently barring him from working in the securities industry.

FINRA has filed a complaint against the second broker, charging him with numerous violations, including unsuitable recommendations, sales and use of margin; failure to provide maximum sales charge discounts on UIT transactions; and, engaging in discretionary trading in customer accounts without written authorization.

FINRA also suspended the two brokers' former supervisor, Donald Mattran of Bel Air, MD, for six months in any principal capacity and fined him $10,000.

 

FINRA found that between February 2004 and November 2006, SunTrust, through Bredenburg and, it is alleged, the second broker, recommended 294 unsuitable short-term UIT, CEF and mutual fund transactions in the accounts of 17 customers. The two brokers repeatedly recommended that the customers sell UITs and CEFs less than one year – and sometimes as soon as one month – after purchasing the securities at the broker's recommendation, with little or no economic benefit to the customer.

FINRA further found that SunTrust, through the two brokers, recommended to 10 of those customers unsuitable purchases and sales of securities on margin – failing to adequately disclose the risks and costs of trading on margin and lacking a reasonable basis for their recommendations. As a result, the customers paid over $133,000 in margin interest.

FINRA also found that SunTrust lacked adequate systems and procedures to monitor UIT and CEF transactions and margin accounts, and to ensure that customers purchasing UITs received applicable sales charge discounts.

 

Furthermore, FINRA found that between February 2004 and December 2005, Mattran and SunTrust approved each short-term transaction, including transactions placed using margin, and did not respond adequately to red flags suggesting that the transactions were unsuitable. For example, the trade blotter listed over 200 sales of UITs and CEFs among the 17 customers' accounts and compliance reviews in August 2004 and April 2005 alerted Mattran and the firm to questionable short-term UIT and CEF transactions by both brokers.

FINRA's action barring Bredenburg found that between February 2004 and March 2009 – while he was registered first with SunTrust and later with Merrill Lynch – Bredenburg recommended at least 167 unsuitable short-term UIT and CEF transactions, including switches, to 13 customers who were elderly, retired or disabled and who had conservative to moderate investment profiles. He also recommended unsuitable transactions on margin and unsuitable variable annuity liquidations. FINRA further found that Bredenburg failed to disclose to customers the costs and fees associated with short-term CEF and UIT transactions, failed to ensure that customers received maximum sales charge discounts on UIT purchases and engaged in discretionary trading without prior written authorization.

In addition, FINRA found that between August 2008 and February 2009, while registered with Merrill Lynch, Bredenburg accessed a customer's Merrill Lynch brokerage account through the internet and, without the customer's knowledge, transferred funds from the customer's account to pay Bredenburg's personal expenses, including mortgage, car loan and credit cards. Merrill Lynch has compensated firm customers affected by Bredenburg's misconduct.

In concluding these settlements, SunTrust, Bredenburg and Mattran neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA's findings. FINRA's charges against the second broker alleged to be involved are pending.


Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  FINRA Says Charles Schwab & Co. Violated Rules with Class-Action Waiver  -  Charles Schwab & Co. violated regulatory rules by requiring customers ...
  Are Public Arbitrators Are More Likely to Award Damages than Those with Financial Expertise?  -  Back in October 2008, the Financial Industr...
  Merrill Lynch Fined $1 Million For Dodging Arbitration Mandated by FINRA  -  Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith has been censured and fined $1 mil...
  Former Red Sox Catcher Scores $1.2 Million Arbitration Award from Merrill Lynch  -  Doug Mirabelli, a former catcher for the Boston Red Sox, was awarded more ...
  Is FINRA Mandatory Arbitration Policy a Violation of Your Legal Rights?  -  According to ...
  FINRA Awards Damages for Firm’s Failure to Reasonably Inform Customers Regarding Bond Recommendation  -  On Jan. 9, an arbitrator for the Financial ...
  Supreme Court: Arbitration Clause in Contract Not Invalidated by Consumers’ Right to Sue  -  The U.S. Supreme Court issued an ...
  The SEC and FINRA Advise Investors to Proceed With Caution Concerning Non-Traded REITs  -  Stock market volatility and low interest rates these days have caused more...
  Wells Fargo Fined $2 Million for Selling Unsuitable Securities to Elderly Customers  -  Wells Fargo Investments LLC has been fined $2 million for failure to super...
  Wachovia Successor to Pay $148 Million to Settle Charges of Fraud and Bid Rigging  -  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank N.A., has agr...

Investment Literature
New Title 1Unholy Alliance: How Wall Street and Washington Sold U.S. Out

New Title 1Unholy Alliance: How Wall Street and Washington Sold U.S. Out

Blood on the Street: The Sensational Inside Story of How Wall Street Analysts Duped a Generation of Investors

Blood on the Street: The Sensational Inside Story of How Wall Street Analysts Duped a Generation of Investors


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (78)
» Broker Fraud (57)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (72)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (94)
» Merrill Lynch (11)
» Morgan Stanley (18)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (21)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (75)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (27)
» stockbroker theft (4)
» Unfair Securities Practices (81)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (1)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (2)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer