Have you been damaged as the result of investment fraud? Representation accepted on a contingent fee basis.  » View Our New Client Questionnaire « 
Arbitration Securities
and Investment Fraud Lawyers
Guiliano Law Firm Securities Arbitration blog
Home > Securities Arbitration Blog > Investors Continue To Get Duped into Equity Linked Notes

Investors Continue To Get Duped into Equity Linked Notes

Filed in: Stockbroker ArbitrationBroker FraudUnfair Securities PracticesMutual Fund FraudSECBrokage Firm FraudFINRA Securities Arbitration
Posted: August 30, 2011 @ 12:39 pm - Nicholas Guiliano
    Wall Street’s most recent synthetic investments, despite the catchy names, offer more risk that your broker is likely to disclose. The retail market for structured notes or equity linked notes, with principal protection has skyrocketed in recent years. Why? Because they are easy to sell to unsuspecting investors, offer high commissions, and have names that make them at least appear safe.

These products often have misleading names such as "principal protection," "capital guarantee," "absolute return," "minimum return" or similar terms, they are not risk-free.

As a preliminary matter, investors will receive principal protection from the issuer they hold these notes until maturity. However, the date of maturity, sometimes as much as 30 years, or whether the issuer is solvent at maturity is another matter.

If an investor needs to cash out their notes before maturity, this might not be possible if no secondary market to sell your note exists and the issuer refuses to redeem it. Even where a secondary market exists, the note may be quite illiquid and the investor could get substantially less than what they paid for these "structured" products.

As broker’s are quick to point out, structured notes with principal protection have the "potential" to outperform the total interest payment that would be paid on typical fixed interest rate bonds. However, some do not point out that these notes also might underperform a typical fixed interest rate bond and could earn no return for the entire term of the note. Also, structured notes with principal protection may have hidden or imputed costs that can be relatively high and difficult to understand.

In December 2009, FINRA and the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy issued an Alert to help make investors aware of these risks.

Structured notes with principal protection typically include an interest rate with an option based upon the price of a derivative product including stocks. In some cases, if the value of the securities goes up, you get your interest, but your upside potential is limited. If the value of the linked derivative product goes down, sometime you get stuck with the underlying asset and can lose all or most of your money.

The bottom line for investors is that structured notes with principal protection can have complicated pay-out structures that can make it hard to accurately assess their risk and potential for growth.

In addition, depending on how the note is structured, the distinct possibility exists that you could tie up your principal for upwards of a decade with the possibility of no profit on your initial investment.

NASD Rule 2310 requires that, before recommending the purchase or sale of a security, firms must have a reasonable basis for determining that the product is suitable for at least some investors. To make this determination, firms must perform adequate due diligence, which includes carefully reviewing and understanding the risks, costs, terms and conditions of the product being offered. Rule 2310 also requires that, before executing a recommended transaction, a firm must make reasonable efforts to obtain information concerning the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and "such other information used or considered to be reasonable by such member or registered representative in making recommendations to the customer."

On August 29, 2011, the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission entered an Order permanently barring David G. Brouwer, formerly associated with Great American Advisors of Homestead, Florida from association with any member in any capacity, and ordered him to pay restitution because he failed to disclose certain material risks associated with equity-linked notes that he recommended as investments to certain customers. The SEC also found that Brouwer told customers that the equity-linked notes were safe when in fact they were not and failed to disclose certain of the investment’s material risks. Brouwer failed to adequately disclose that there was a possibility that the equity-linked notes would convert into the underlying securities at a value less than the invested principal.

If you have suffered losses as a result of an investment made by the recommendation of your stockbroker or investment professional in "Equity Linked," "Principal Protected," or other Structured Notes, you may have a viable legal claim and ought to consult with a lawyer.

Our practice is limited to the litigation of securities related claims and FINRA arbitrations on behalf of defrauded investors. We offer our services on a contingent fee basis, and there is never any charge for a consultation. For more information contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire, Guiliano Law Firm, P.C.


 Principal Protected Notes     Equity Linked Notes     SLCG Linked Notes Article     Brouwer SEC Order
Blog Article Search
 

Subscribe!
RSS Subscription

Recent Articles
  Court Dismisses Charles Schwab Suit that Challenged FINRA on Class Action Waivers  -  A federal court in California dismissed a complaint filed by Charles Schwa...
  Former Newbridge Securities Broker Suspended and Fined for Unsuitable Switching of Annuities  -  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (...
  Wells Fargo Brokerage Firms Fined for Failure to Supervise ETF Sales  -  A group of limited liability companies affiliated with Wells Fargo have ag...
  Morgan Stanley Fined $1.75 Million for Weak Supervision of ETF Sales  -  Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC has consented to be fined $1.75 million by th...
  UBS Puerto Rico to Pay $26 Million for Fraud Related to Mutual Funds  -  UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico and two of its executives have ...
  Former Ameritas Broker Barred by FINRA and Ordered to Pay Restitution  -  Harold E. Wilson, a former broker with ...
  The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Orders Transfer and Consolidation Of National Royal Alliance Ponzi Scheme Cases to Philadelphia  -  In October 2010, Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire of the Guiliano Law Firm, P...
  FINRA Files Action Against Former Broker for Misappropriation  -  The Department of Enforcement of the Financ...
  Federal Court Rules Ignorance no Excuse for Brokerage Firm that Employed Thieving Broker  -  An arbitration claim by Lucy and John Mattinen against White Pacific Secur...
  Former LPL Financial Broker Failed to Inform Firm About Promissory Notes  -  When Jeffrey D. Ogle, formerly a broker with LPL Financial LLC, induced fi...

Investment Literature
You Can't Cheat an Honest Man: How Ponzi Schemes and Pyramid Frauds Work...And Why They're More Common Than Ever

You Can't Cheat an Honest Man: How Ponzi Schemes and Pyramid Frauds Work...And Why They're More Common Than Ever

The Beardstown Ladies' Common-Sense Investment Guide: How We Beat the Stock Market-And How You Can, Too

The Beardstown Ladies' Common-Sense Investment Guide: How We Beat the Stock Market-And How You Can, Too


Archive
January - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
February - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
March - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
April - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
May - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
June - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
July - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
August - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
September - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
October - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
November - 2009   2010   2011   2012  
December - 2009   2010   2011   2012  

Categories
» Brokage Firm Fraud (83)
» Broker Fraud (65)
» FINRA Securities Arbitration (79)
» Insider Trading (15)
» Investment Fraud (105)
» Merrill Lynch (12)
» Morgan Stanley (19)
» Mutual Fund Fraud (22)
» Preferred Securities Fraud (1)
» RBC Capital Markets (2)
» Richard Byerly (1)
» SEC (77)
» Stockbroker Arbitration (28)
» stockbroker theft (7)
» Unfair Securities Practices (92)
» Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. (2)
» Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C. (3)

Bookmark and Share




FINRA Securities Arbitration
- Arbitration is Litigation
- The Securities Arbitration Process
- The Arbitrators
- Discovery
- Arbitration Awards

Latest Securities News
- Archive

Claims Against Brokers
- Suitability
- Misrepresentations and Omissions
- Mutual Fund Fraud
- Annuity Fraud
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Unauthorized Trading
- Securities Of Financial Institutions

Investor Resources
- Check Your Broker
- Check Your Brokerage Firm
- Check Your Investment Advisor
- Investor Resource Links
Securities Arbitration Blog
- Archive
- Categories

Contact Us
- Online Contact Form
- Evaluation Process
- Frequently Asked Questions

About The Firm
- The Lawyers
- The Professional Staff
- The Green Initiative
Our Office Location(s):
230 South Broad Street
Suite 601
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Telephone: (215) 413-8223
Telecopier/Fax: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) SEC-ATTY
Email: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Martindale-Hubbel
View Disclaimer
Copyright 2012 ©. All rights reserved. Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire
Philadelphia Lawyer - Stockbroker Fraud - Investment Fraud Lawyer